Thinks JDH is a bit hard on Asa Gray.

Bates's letter is that of a true thinker. Asks to see JDH's to Bates. Point raised in it is most difficult. "There is one clear line of distinction; - when many parts of structure as in woodpecker show distinct adaptation to external bodies, it is preposterous to attribute them to effect of climate etc. - but when a single point, alone, as a hooked seed, it is conceivable that it may thus have arisen." His study of orchids shows nearly all parts of the flower co-adapted for fertilisation by insects and therefore the result of natural selection. Mormodes ignea "is a prodigy of adaptation".

CD pleased with Huxley for defending him against Sabine. Also pleased with much of Sabine's address. Is sure JDH wrote the botanical part.

Suggests James Hector observe which insects visit endemic New Zealand plants

and JDH examine distribution of white vs coloured corollas in New Zealand.

Encloses memorandum on Origin [1866]

discussing mimicry in mammals and birds,

abnormal habits shown by birds,

behaviour of cuckoos,

and analogies existing between mammals of the same geographical region.

Speculates on possible lines of development linking groups of mammals.

[CD's notes on the verso of the letter are for his reply.]

AG's review of Variation [Nation 6 (1868): 234-6] very good.

CD's fondness for Pangenesis; although an "infant cherished by few", CD expects it to have a long life.

Outlines his theory on the origin of existing orders of leaf arrangement. Believes spiral and whorled orders have evolved from a primitive distichous arrangement. These arrangements permit a compact bud form of small surface area that can withstand external changes in temperature, and in particular can tolerate frost.