From Daniel Oliver 17 February 1863
Royal Gardens Kew
17.ii.1863
My dear Sir
Next to save you throwing away valuable time, the connection with the phyllotaxy difficulty it is not worth yr. while reading Braun’s Essay (Verjüngung) excepting at p. 116.—1 the Essays referred to in note same page may throw further light,2 but I think you have enough now for Dr Falconer3
Ever Yours Sincerely | D. Oliver
Footnotes
Bibliography
Braun, Alexander Carl Heinrich. 1851. Betrachtungen über die Erscheinung der Verjüngung in der Natur, insbesondere in der Lebens- und Bildungsgeschichte der Pflanze. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
Bravais, Auguste and Bravais, Louis. 1838. Essai sur la disposition générale des feuilles rectisériées. Congrès scientifique de France 6: 278–330.
Marginalia: Charles Darwin’s marginalia. Edited by Mario A. Di Gregorio with the assistance of Nicholas W. Gill. Vol. 1. New York and London: Garland Publishing. 1990.
Naumann, Karl Friedrich. 1845. Ueber den Quincunx als Grundgesetz der Blattstellung vieler Pflanzen. Dresden and Leipzig: Arnoldische Buchhandlung.
Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.
Summary
DO thinks an essay [Alexander Braun’s "Rejuvenescence", Ray Society (1853)] is not worth reading with respect to some difficulty concerning phyllotaxy.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-8770
- From
- Daniel Oliver
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Kew
- Source of text
- DAR 173: 20
- Physical description
- ALS 2pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 8770,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-8770.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 11