To J. D. Hooker 8 September [1856]1
Down Bromley Kent
Sept. 8th.
My dear Hooker
I got your letter of the 1st. this morning;2 & a real good man you have been to write. Of all the things I ever heard, Mrs. Hooker’s pedestrian feats beats them. My Brother is quite right in his comparison of “as strong as a woman”,—as a type of strength.— Your letter, after what you have seen in Himalaya &c, gives me a wonderful idea of the beauty of the Alps. How I wish I was one half or one quarter as strong as Mrs. Hooker: but that is a vain hope. You must have had some very interesting work with glaciers &c.3 When will the glacier structure & motion ever be settled! When reading Tyndall’s paper it seemed to me that movement in the particles must come into play in his own doctrine of pressure;4 for he expressly states that if there be pressure on all side, there is no lamination: I suppose I cannot have understood him, for I shd. have inferred from this that there must have been movement parallel to planes of pressure. Sorby read paper to Brit. Assoc. & he comes to conclusion that Gneiss &c may be metamorphosed cleavage or strata; & I think he admits much chemical segregation along the planes of division.5 I quite subscribe to this view, & shd. have been sorry to have been so utterly wrong, as I shd. have been, if foliation was identical with stratification.6
I have been no where & seen no one & really have no news of any kind to tell you.— I have been working away as usual (floating plants in salt-water inter alia & confound them, they all sink pretty soon, but at very different rates) working hard at Pigeons &c &c By the way I have been astonished at differences in skeletons of domestic Rabbits:7 I showed some of the points to Waterhouse & asked him whether he could pretend that they were not as great as between species, & he answered “they are a great deal more”.—8 How very odd it is that no zoologist shd. ever have thought it worth while to look to the real structure of varieties.—
I most earnestly hope that at Vienna you will make particular enquiries about the pure Laburnum, which one year bore the hybrid flowers & on one sprig the C. purpureus.—9 Dr. Reissik(?) is name of man I think.— Bentham10 will not believe that it was a pure Laburnum, & it does seem quite incredible, notwithstanding the clear statements in the Flora.11 Please enquire particularly whether the hybrid or purple or pure bears seeds: I have just got the seeds of a yellow branch from the sterile hybrid to sow & see what will come up.— Really this case ought to be investigated,12 & if you, the King of Sceptics believe, all others may.—
My poor wife keeps very uncomfortable, but rather better than she was.13
With our kindest regards to Mrs Hooker. | Believe me | My dear Hooker | Ever yours | C. Darwin
Footnotes
Bibliography
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
Hornschuch, Christian Friedrich. 1848. Ueber Ausartung der Pflanzen. Flora, oder allgemeine botanische Zeitung n.s. 6: 17-28, 33–44, 50–64, 66–86. [Vols. 5,6]
Sorby, Henry Clifton. 1856. On the microscopical structure of mica-schist. Report of the 26th meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held at Cheltenham, Transactions of the sections, p. 78.
Tyndall, John. 1856. Comparative view of the cleavage of crystals and slate rocks. Notices of the Proceedings at the meetings of the members of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 2 (1854–8): 295–308.
Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.
Waterhouse, George Robert. 1846–8. A natural history of the Mammalia. 2 vols. London: H. Baillière.
Summary
Whether or not there should be movement of particles according to Tyndall’s theory of glacial action ["Observations on glaciers", Not. Proc. R. Inst. G. B. 2: 54–8, 441–3].
CD subscribes to H. C. Sorby’s view of gneiss [Edinburgh New Philos. J. 55 (1853): 137–50].
Seed-salting.
Pigeons.
Significant differences in skeletons of domesticated rabbits.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-1950
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Joseph Dalton Hooker
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 114: 176
- Physical description
- ALS 6pp ††
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 1950,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-1950.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 6